At Cascade, we have a tremendous opportunity to encourage people to bicycle, reduce the size of our collective carbon footprint and improve the health and well-being of our families, friends and neighbors — in short, to create communities that bicycle. If Cascade is to continue being a leader in this transformation, the club needs strong leaders — leaders with vision and drive — to serve on its board.
Over the last several months, the club’s Nominations Committee, chaired by board member Bill Ptacek, has been busy searching for such leaders. The committee was delighted to present a nine-member slate of candidates to the club’s board of directors and to have the full slate approved. These nine candidates will be running for four open 2012 to 2014 board positions as the board expands to 12 members from its current nine (one current board member will be stepping down).
Voting in our annual election is a great way to participate in the future of your club. Click on the links below to read candidate statements, meet the candidates in person at the Annual Membership Meeting or the Board Candidate Forum, and remember to cast your ballot before October 11. Thank you for your help in ensuring that Cascade’s leadership remains strong.
Candidates for the 2012 Board of Directors:
- Nick Brown
- Candy Castellanos
- Jessica Emerson
- Everett Fruehling
- Jon Gould
- Dr. Rayburn Lewis
- Mo McBroom
- Charles Ruthford
- Ed Yoshida
Meet the candidates in person:
- Board Candidate Forum
Thursday, Oct. 6
7 to 8:30 p.m. (Doors open at 6:30 p.m.)
Mountaineers Office, Magnuson Park, 7400 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle
- Annual Membership Meeting
Tuesday, Oct. 11
7 to 8:30 p.m. (Doors open at 6:30 p.m.)
REI Seattle, 222 Yale Ave. N, Seattle
Meet the candidates online
If you are unable to make the in-person candidate meetings, you can still meet the candidates on the Cascade forums. Reading the forums is open to anyone, but if you want to post, you must first join the forums.
Bylaws revisions
In early 2012, Cascade will convene a Task Force to review our bylaws. If you are interested in being a member of this group, please call the office at (206) 522-3222. In the meantime, several contentious and perhaps outdated bylaws were reviewed by a Committee appointed by the Board of Directors. The Committee’s recommended changes appear on the October ballot along with the board candidates.
The board is proposing bylaw revisions in three areas: (a) the process for director recall; (b) the terms of board-appointed interim directors; and (c) the quorum required for the board to conduct Club business. The full text of each recommended change is here and will also be mailed to members in the October issue of the Cascade Courier. Please see the FAQ for information. Ratifying the proposed changes will require a two-thirds majority of all votes cast.
Vote:
Download a ballot or look for a copy in the October issue of the Cascade Courier. Ballots must be dropped off at the Annual Membership Meeting or mailed to Cascade Bicycle Club at 7400 Sand Point Way NE, Suite 101S, Seattle 98115. Ballots must be post-marked by October 11.



I’ve heard some complaints that we don’t have an online candidate forum, and we heard the same complaints last year, so let me toss out a few questions and see what happens.
1. How electronic and online do you think Cascade should be?
2. What does a board of directors do?
3. What do you hope to accomplish by serving on the board?
4. If you aren’t elected, would you try to serve on a committee or task force?
Thanks for your willingness to run and your willingness to serve if you are elected.
It is imperative that Cascade have some sort of on-line candidates forum. Very few of us have the time or energy to go all the way to Magnuson Park after work on a week night. Who under the age of, say, 75 does not have internet access? Only having a face-to-face candidates forum ensures that only those who live around the NE portion of Seattle, are retired, or really really really care about the elections will be informed.
I agree with Claire, you could really make this simple. Have the candidates join the already exisiting Community Forum under Govt & Policy. Let people ask the questions and let them respond. I think Cascade needs to be a lot more online.
I can see it both ways. We want it to be easy for those of us who live online. On the other hand, if a board member isn’t active on facebook or forums, however, does that make them unworthy of your vote? People have lives, and board members are volunteers. Not everyone is active in the online community world. That’s not such a sin.
I checked a few other non-profits of which I am a member, and no one else seems to be doing this. Can you point me in the direction of one that does?
REI: http://www.rei.com/aboutrei/boardcontact.html
I don’t know how KUOW’s board is appointed: http://www.kuow.org/about/board.php
KEXP’s minutes are pretty out of date: http://kexp.org/about/adboard.asp
All of these organizations have invested heavily in having an online presence, yet none of them are hosting online board forums. I wonder why?
If you have any hope of getting answers to your burning questions, why not just start asking here? What do you really want to know that’s not included in their statement? Get something started!
Agreed, an on-line forum would be a huge step towards empowering those thousands of members who do not have convenient access to the in-person forum.
As a bicycle commuter with a full-time job, I don’t really have an extra hour each way to get up to Sand Point Way by bike and bus.
Does the Club have enough parking for even 100 outlying members to drive to a forum?
Tele-debate, like tele-commuting and vote-by-mail, is part of society’s evolution away from the notion that everyone should be expected to drive everywhere every day.
Restricting official debate to a single physical location is willful disenfranchisement of the majority of members.
If we have a club dinner and some members don’t have teeth, must we all eat porridge? Those without teeth can have porridge. The carnivores can have meat, and the vegans their own thing. Perhaps the forums and blog should be taken down. REI doesn’t have them.
Hey, I just noticed we’re having dialog right here. Maybe something like THIS could be done! Links to the discussion would be posted everywhere.
If you’re running for the Board I assume you’re savvy and will show up. This is part of showing up. Enough with the lame excuses by surrogates and silence from board members and candidates (M. Snyder excluded). I’m not buying into it at all.
They don’t want to do it and won’t do it. Now lets find out why.
Hi fellow cyclists! As as candidate for the board, I value this dialogue. Here’s where I stand on the questions Michael posed below:
1. How electronic and online do you think Cascade should be?
We should be increasingly active and communicative online, but not to the exclusion of other interactions. Online is essential and should be seen as one channel of interaction with members and non members of the Club.
FYI: I asked Chuck about whether members could vote for the board online and he said it was prohibited by state nonprofit law.
Also, I will be at the candidate forum and annual meeting.
2. What does a board of directors do?
The only three legal duties of a nonprofit board are these:
1. Duty of Care – meaning be prudent when making decisions as a steward of the organization.
2. Duty of Loyalty – meaning undivided allegiance when making decisions affecting the organization.
3. Duty of Obedience – meaning be faithful to the organization’s mission.
That said, each board establishes it own board model, based on the needs and culture of the organization.
And, a membership organization is not just any nonprofit…it has a special responsibility to the membership. I wouldn’t be interested in joining the board if CBC wasn’t a membership based organization. I work for a membership-based organization (Children’s Alliance) and have spent much of my career in this arena.
Here’s also what I said in my candidate statement about the role of the board:
The board can best contribute to the success of the organization by representing the Club’s membership, providing strategic direction, and strong oversight and support to the Executive Director.
3. What do you hope to accomplish by serving on the board?
I don’t want to be so verbose here, but first and foremost, I would be a team rider and do what is best for the board and organization. In a nutshell, I’d like to help grow the organization by reaching new constituencies, provide support to the ED, and help move the strategic plan goals to reality.
4. If you aren’t elected, would you try to serve on a committee or task force?
Yes! I’d choose based on my interests and the Club’s needs.
-Jon Gould
I will also answer Michael’s questions:
1. I think electronic communication is important, but it should not be the exclusive means of communication. The Cascade Courier still has it place as do newspapers and agazines. The CBC needs to serve its members. There could be an option for e-communications only for those who desire only electronic comunications.
2. In my mind, a Bosrd of direcotrs provides direction for an organization based on the understood needs of the membership. That means making the big decisions as to goals and direction. It also means stepping back and allowing the staff, who I see as taksed with the everyday operations, to carry out those plans and directions of the Board. Both need to work together in settiing and implenmenting policy.
3. I would like to contiue to see the CBC grow and prosper in the same areas direction it is aready moving in; greater access and safety on the roads for cyclist; increasing acceptance and tolerance for all people whether on bikes, in cars, walking or on transit. I also want cycling to be fun. Almost everyone has at one point in their life riden a bicycle and had fun. Let’s not lose sight of the great social and recreational aspects of cycling. That’s what brings new members and retains many of them. STP, RSVP, ChillyHilly, are all fun and that’s what introduces many to cycling. Let’s get more people on bikes. The more there are the greater will be our collective influence on policy and general attitude toward cycling.
4. If not elected I would like to work on more advocasy. I atteneded the Bike PAC meeting and came away inspired to do more to speak out for political change to foster governmental policies that make sense to encourage cycling and safer streets.
Everett E. Fruehling
I’d like to make a correction re: electronic voting.
Electronic voting for nonprofit organizations is legal so long as the organization’s bylaws specifically state that it is allowed. CBC bylaws do not currently specify electronic voting as an option.
Thank you to Kathy McCabe for catching this and sending me this correction!
Jon
[...] Board candidate profiles [...]
Hey everyone,
We set up an online “Meet the candidates” on the Cascade forums. Please read and post questions of candidates at http://www.cascade.org/Community/forum/categories.cfm?catid=25