<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cascade election results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cascade.org/2011/10/new-board-members/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cascade.org/2011/10/new-board-members/</link>
	<description>Creating a better community through bicycling, throughout Seattle, King County and Washington state.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:17:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Shalit</title>
		<link>http://blog.cascade.org/2011/10/new-board-members/comment-page-1/#comment-29806</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Shalit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 16:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cascade.org/?p=8761#comment-29806</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not casting stones. I&#039;m celebrating mediocrity. Want to hear more, or is any dissent from the &quot;happy talk express&quot; unacceptable to you? I&#039;m prepared to tell it like it is.

I believe in &quot;think global, act local&quot;. I can&#039;t see how an organization that&#039;s clueless and inertia-bound in how to engage its own members politically, can think its candidate recommendations for the general election have any impact at all.

It&#039;s a case of &quot;do as I say, not as I do&quot;. CBC says &quot;you should get out and vote for pro-bike candidates&quot;, but does little to engage its own members in club elections. The little it did, was done reluctantly and under duress.

By choosing to NOT engage club members in club politics (elections), the club weakens its ability to motivate members to vote for Pro-Bike candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not casting stones. I&#8217;m celebrating mediocrity. Want to hear more, or is any dissent from the &#8220;happy talk express&#8221; unacceptable to you? I&#8217;m prepared to tell it like it is.</p>
<p>I believe in &#8220;think global, act local&#8221;. I can&#8217;t see how an organization that&#8217;s clueless and inertia-bound in how to engage its own members politically, can think its candidate recommendations for the general election have any impact at all.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a case of &#8220;do as I say, not as I do&#8221;. CBC says &#8220;you should get out and vote for pro-bike candidates&#8221;, but does little to engage its own members in club elections. The little it did, was done reluctantly and under duress.</p>
<p>By choosing to NOT engage club members in club politics (elections), the club weakens its ability to motivate members to vote for Pro-Bike candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lamar Bass</title>
		<link>http://blog.cascade.org/2011/10/new-board-members/comment-page-1/#comment-29803</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamar Bass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 14:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cascade.org/?p=8761#comment-29803</guid>
		<description>before casting stones, let&#039;s see if the off year election turnout by the general public is any better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>before casting stones, let&#8217;s see if the off year election turnout by the general public is any better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Shalit</title>
		<link>http://blog.cascade.org/2011/10/new-board-members/comment-page-1/#comment-29687</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Shalit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 04:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cascade.org/?p=8761#comment-29687</guid>
		<description>3.4% voter turnout. Bravo! That may mean 96.4% of members are satisfied with the status quo. Let&#039;s hope members are as committed to voting for pro-bicycle candidates in the general election. Congratulations on engaging membership!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3.4% voter turnout. Bravo! That may mean 96.4% of members are satisfied with the status quo. Let&#8217;s hope members are as committed to voting for pro-bicycle candidates in the general election. Congratulations on engaging membership!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Volta</title>
		<link>http://blog.cascade.org/2011/10/new-board-members/comment-page-1/#comment-29091</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Volta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 01:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cascade.org/?p=8761#comment-29091</guid>
		<description>We had 352 affirmative votes for the bylaw changes or 75%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had 352 affirmative votes for the bylaw changes or 75%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bike News Roundup: Really old photos of people doing freestyle tricks &#124; Seattle Bike Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.cascade.org/2011/10/new-board-members/comment-page-1/#comment-29055</link>
		<dc:creator>Bike News Roundup: Really old photos of people doing freestyle tricks &#124; Seattle Bike Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cascade.org/?p=8761#comment-29055</guid>
		<description>[...] Results from the recent Cascade Bicycle Club election. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Results from the recent Cascade Bicycle Club election. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.J. Kelly</title>
		<link>http://blog.cascade.org/2011/10/new-board-members/comment-page-1/#comment-28994</link>
		<dc:creator>M.J. Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cascade.org/?p=8761#comment-28994</guid>
		<description>Pat, we (triple) counted 469 ballots. Not sure about the bylaws change, but it passed by above the 2/3 necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat, we (triple) counted 469 ballots. Not sure about the bylaws change, but it passed by above the 2/3 necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Matson</title>
		<link>http://blog.cascade.org/2011/10/new-board-members/comment-page-1/#comment-28984</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Matson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cascade.org/?p=8761#comment-28984</guid>
		<description>What was the # of voters?

What was the tally on the bylaw changes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was the # of voters?</p>
<p>What was the tally on the bylaw changes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
