Author Archive

Vulnerable User Bill on Gov. Gregoire’s Desk

Tuesday, May 10th, 2011 by

Three years of hard work have paid off in the form of enhanced protection for vulnerable roadway users as Senate Bill 5326 is past the legislature. And we’ve just been informed that the Governor will sign the Vulnerable User Bill on Monday, May 16.

So many good people made such an enormous commitment to the passage of this bill, and we couldn’t have done it without them. The Blacks, Norrises, Brulottes, and others lost parents, children, lovers and friends. They had the courage and conviction to stand before the legislature and relive their losses. We did this for them, for those who went before them, and those who may come after them.

This is their bill more than it is ours, and I was privileged and honored to be able to be their advocate on this issue.

In the end, this bill is about outcomes. Outcomes matter in Washington state in so many other instances. For instance, killing someone while driving drunk isn’t merely a DUI with a “tragic accident”, it’s vehicular manslaughter. Our laws distinguish between people’s intent, and the actual consequences that result from their actions. But because driving is such a routine activity, however dangerous, our laws were mostly scrubbed of serious penalties for causing injury or death.

The Vulnerable User Bill passed this year is substantially changed from the effort launched in 2009, when our emphasis was on restoring Seattle’s “assault by vehicle” ordinance. Not only wasn’t the idea of a patchwork of local ordinances a good idea, but there also wasn’t any stomach for criminalizing “simple negligence” of this sort in Olympia.

Penalties in the bill range from moderate to severe. One may opt to surrender their license and pay a civil fine of $5000, or one may appear in court and request the alternative penalty. Under the alternative, one would perform up to 100-hours of community service in traffic safety or driver improvement, complete a state approved traffic safety course, and pay a fine of $250.

The law will become effective in June of 2012 to give the State time to make changes to its ticketing systems and court computers. Cascade Bicycle Club will monitor its implementation and see how often it is applied to the few hundred incidents that fall in the grey area between an infraction and a crime.

Burke-Gilman Trail redevelopment in Lake Forest Park update

Wednesday, April 20th, 2011 by

Click to enlarge

After a short delay caused by bid-dispute, King County Parks is almost ready to redevelop 1.7 miles of the Burke-Gilman Trail in Lake Forest Park. It is anticipated that the trail will close at the end of May, and it will remain completely closed for four to six months.

The closure will be annoying for some and a significant hardship for others. Whatever your situation, the county is working with Cascade Bicycle Club and other governments to mitigate it to the greatest degree possible. One piece of the mitigation, a signed and improved detour, has been identified – and now needs permits from the City of Lake Forest Park.

While there is little reason to think the detour is in trouble, it is important to emphasize that the route is not official until King County Parks has secured permits from the cities of Lake Forest Park, Shoreline and Seattle.

To date, permits have been secured from the city of Shoreline and will soon be finalized with the city of Seattle.

The city of Lake Forest Park opened a 14-day comment period on Friday, April 15, for the segment of the detour located within city limits. Information about the permit and comment period is posted on the Lake Forest Park website.

Please take a moment to provide a comment on this permit by emailing Steve Bennett, Planning Director, or send written comment to: LFP City Hall 17425 Ballinger Way NE, Lake Forest Park, WA 98155

Finally, as soon as the specific closure date is identified, it will be announced in the local press, posted on the project website, on signage on the trail and here on our blog.

Tired of talk? Demand action!

Friday, November 5th, 2010 by

We co-founded the Streets For All Seattle campaign because the people of Seattle want transportation choices that make sense for our city and vibrant neighborhoods, and that are safe and accessible for everyone. Seattle’s elected officials have spoken out for world-class pedestrian, bicycle and transit infrastructure, but so far, they have failed to match the talk with action.

Right now, Seattle City Council has a golden opportunity to align their words with their actions, and take the vital next step towards funding a transportation system that works for our future. The proposed 2011 – 2012 City budget includes a modest increase in funding for pedestrians, bicycling and transit. The City Council will decide this weekend whether or not to protect this critical funding.

Please email the City Council and voice your support
for funding for pedestrians, bicycles and transit!

The City Council says they share our goals. They have taken some positive steps in the right direction, but unless the Council approves the proposed new revenue, funding for pedestrian and bicycling improvements will decrease by 25% from last year’s already woefully inadequate amount. The Council is also poised to renege on a promise to replace funding for pedestrian and bicycling improvements that they stripped from the budget last year. They appear content to use Tim Eyman-style government and have voters decide whether or not we should fund our core priorities.

A ballot measure to fund pedestrian, bicycle and transit improvements is a great idea, and if crafted correctly, it would have our strong support. If, however, the Council is serious about aligning our transportation investments with the values and priorities of our citizens, then NOW is the time for action.

You stood with us at the budget hearings; now, help put us over the top: email the City Council and tell them you support funding for feet, bikes and transit in the budget!

Breaking: Missing Link opponent’s appeal dismissed

Friday, September 17th, 2010 by

Salmon Bay Sand and Gravel and other  Ballard businesses opposed to safety improvements, including the long-overdue completion of the “missing link” of the Burke-Gilman Trail, along Shilshole Ave in Ballard were dealt another blow in the courts.

After last summer’s decision in King County Superior Court, which sided with the city and Cascade Bicycle Club on eight of nine complaints, the judge remanded the environmental review to the city so that they could study the 0.3 miles of Shilshole Ave that hadn’t been evaluated.  Even though the next phase of the environmental review has yet to be completed, trail-opponents rushed to appeal Judge Rogers ruling on the eight complaints where he found in Cascade’s favor.

Today, the Court  dismissed Salmon Bay’s appeal. While Salmon Bay may ask the panel of the three judges assigned to the case to modify the commissioner’s order, it is unlikely that they would.

As for the status of the project, it is our understanding that the required additional environmental review is almost complete and that the city is looking at issuing a new threshold determination on full project, including the so-called permanent route on Shilshole Ave NW, by sometime in December.

From there we will likely have to go before the Hearing Examiner once again and then back to Judge Rogers courtroom.  [Edit:] SDOT intends to see through the full appellate process before the trail is built.

Thank you to everyone who rallied in support of trail completion.

Ferry commuters – Go to the back of the line!

Monday, September 13th, 2010 by

One has to wonder how long the cars had to wait for the bikes to unload on Bike to Work Day. (Photo: RedBox Pictures)

At the request of Governor Gregoire and the Washington Legislature, a panel of ferry system managers from around the United States was convened to assess Washington State Ferries planning, management and operations. Thursday, Sept. 9, the panel released its report and recommendations for improving ferry service in Washington state.

Unfortunately, the news isn’t good for ferry bicycle commuters. If you’re coming in to Seattle from Bainbridge or Bremerton, and planning on riding the last few blocks to your office – you’ll just need to cool your heels and wait… and wait… and wait.

Loading and Unloading of Vehicles and Passengers

WSF is seeking ways to expedite loading operations for several reasons. Currently, bicycle loading/unloading is a challenge since they are first off the vessel and can impede the unloading of cars. This creates a safety issue, which is more important than the delay, with the anxious drivers that have waited to unload now following the bikes down the road.

Panel recommends that cars be unloaded ahead of bikes.

Safety is of the paramount importance with efficiency second. The Panel recommends that a trial project be undertaken to change the loading/unloading sequence with bicycles being loaded last and unloaded last. This allows better separation of vehicles and bicycles and gives the Mate more control over the space allocated to bikes. Bikes are also slower than cars and can slow the disembarkation of those they are in front of. By holding back bikes, it also avoids the need for bicyclists to move through the car deck with their bikes in order to get to the front of the vessel. By off loading after the vehicles, bikes will not be sharing the road at the same time as the disembarking vehicles, allowing for a margin of safety.

Let’s think about this for a minute: the very people who are helping the state comply with the Climate Law, and the VMT Law, the people who are taking up little space on the ferries and not congesting the roads around terminals – it’s those people who are a problem.  They’re a problem because they hold up cars.  They frustrate and delay vehicle operators.  Note the code words, like “anxious drivers.” (I wonder if “anxious” is a technical term and how the anxiety was measured. Did they count the number of sad faces spotted through windshields?)

Despite the transparent phrasing regarding delayed and “anxious” car-users, WSF tries to phrase the issue in the context of safety. One assumes that they mean that its unsafe for bicyclists to be passed by motorists. If that’s the case, then perhaps it would be safer if we all just stopped riding our bicycles – because we all get passed by cars somewhat regularly. Snark aside, in the 79-page report, no evidence or data is presented to support the assertion that load order has any impact on safety.

Bike commuters departing the ferry are absorbed onto city streets in minutes. (Photo: RedBox Pictures)

Finally, WSF goes on to offer a whopper of a red-herring by stating, “By holding back bikes, it also avoids the need for bicyclists to move through the car deck with their bikes.” As anyone who commutes on the ferries is aware, WSF crews don’t allow bicyclists to walk their bikes forward, for fear that cars may be scratched by bikes moving between the rows.  (I guess cars are impervious to scratches from strollers, handbags and clothing with metal buckles. Moreover, one wonders why they even allow motorists to open their doors, as they’ve been known to ding other cars too.)

Let Washington State Ferries know what you think.  Email Ray Deardorf, WSF Planning Director and Jill Satran in the Governor’s office to let them know what you think.