Author Archive

Bikes on the Hill: Top Ten Highlights from Washington, D.C.

Thursday, April 5th, 2012 by

Well hello, summer!

There’s nothing like strolling around our country’s capital on an early spring day, the cherry blossoms popping and the police motorcades buzzing around with who-knows-what cabinet member inside.

With 75 degrees and sunshine the new normal for spring (and winter!) in D.C., I can’t help but imagine those cabinet members (or the President himself) probably want to be outside.  I don’t blame them.  It’s where the action is.  And it’s where Capital Bikeshare is.

Bikeshare staring down the Capitol on Pennsylvania Ave = awesomeness

Their Bikeshare system alone is enough to lure me back to Washington, D.C.; I wrote about its brilliance last year.  While I managed to truly use Bikeshare on several occasions—like racing to the capital in a suit slightly late for a meeting with one of our Senators—we were really there for the 2012 National Bike Summit.

National Bike Summit was a great few days of idea sharing, lobbying and celebrations and, instead of hashing out all of the details, I’ll reduce it to this: Bikes on The Hill: The Top Ten Highlights from Washington, D.C. Here goes:

10.  The aforementioned cherry blossoms. We certainly have ours here in Washington State right now, but where the heck is our warm weather and sunshine?

9. The Gen Y Guy, Jason Dorsey. Known for his hilarious delivery and big name clientele, his poignant observations about generational differences gave us much to think about in terms of reaching—and motivating—our audience.

Congressman Earl Blumenauer: not gonna give an inch

8. Panel presentations and sessions. I have to admit: I missed a few of these, mainly because I had set up a meetings with our national partners at their offices in D.C.  But I did give one of the presentations, and I think that one went well (or at least I was told.)  Quite the list of presentations.

7. Fun, engaging and informal conversations. As soon as I sat down for the opening dinner, a great guy from Arizona shouted: “You’re from Cascade!  How’s your endorsement process work?  Are you at 15,000 members yet?  What can you tell me about working with the legislature?”  Wow.  Not bad.  I guess people know about us in Arizona!  At breakfasts, at lunches, in presentations, over drinks, I had more inspiring and engaging conversations about bicycling than I can remember.

6. Campaign Wizard Mark McKinnon. A well-known political advisor and media guru, Mark has worked for Lance Armstrong, George W. Bush, Senator John McCain, and U2’s Bono.  He shared some of his magic with us on how to win campaigns.  He really brought down the house and I look forward to employing his insights.

Congressman Adam Smith of Washington's 9th: always well-informed and supportive on our issues

5. Earl Blumenauer and Ray LaHood. Along with Congresswoman Donna Edwards (D-MD) and Congressmen Tom Petri (R-WI) and Peter DeFazio (D-OR), Earl and Ray kicked off the summit.  Congressman Blumenauer is a champion for bicycling and is our keynote at our eighth annual Bike to Work Breakfast on May 4th.  Ray LaHood, the US Transportation Secretary, has truly been an amazing ambassador for bicycling and public safety.  I’ve written adoring words about him previously here.

4. A strong state delegation. Our group of 15 Washington staters was truly remarkable.  We had senior leadership from REI and Raleigh America.  We had bike shop owners.  We had the Transportation Director from the UW.  We had advocates from our friends the Bicycle Alliance of Washington.  And, of course, we had Cascade staff.  Together, we played a great tag-team in our meetings with Congress, drawing on personal stories, making the business case for bicycling and catching the ears of congresspeople and their staff.

3. Face time. Over 800 attendees from 49 states put together nearly 400 meetings with Congress while we were there! Our Washington State group met face-to-face with a majority of our federal delegation and with staff from all offices.  We even were led through the underground tunnels to the floor of the House where we met with Congresswoman Jaime Herrera Buetler in between votes.  Developing stronger relationships and making a strong case for dedicated funding for bicycling was our mission—and from follow up conversations I’ve had with congressional staff, we did well.

The late night monument tour by capital bikeshare

2. Bikeshare. At night.  With national monuments. Getting around D.C. by Capital Bikeshare is about as easy as it gets, even in the dark (the bikes have automatic lights).  Swipe a card, grab a bike, drop it at our destination, grab another one, repeat.  I can’t wait until we have a similar system in Seattle.

1. Killing H.R. 7. Yes, the House Transportation Bill, H.R. 7, was a nightmare for bicycling since it completely gutted funding for bikes.  Along with your help and in collaboration with our national partners, we laid H.R. 7 to rest.  It meant extending the current bill a ninth time and for another three months, but that buys time for the Senate and House to reach a deal that includes funding for bicycle infrastructure.  Our visit to D.C. helped make a lasting impression on Congress.  They heard loudly and clearly that bicycling is a legitimate form of transportation and everyone deserves the right to safely use the roads and trails across our country.

U.S. Senate Passes Transportation Bill: What It Means for Bikes and What’s Next

Thursday, March 15th, 2012 by

Congressman Earl Blumenauer, full speed ahead

It was only 896 days late, but who’s counting now?  While Congress has yet to get a bill to the president’s desk, the U.S. Senate passed a bipartisan bill yesterday that keeps that dream alive—and showed the House that making our roads safer and getting people to work is more important than playing election-year politics.  It’s been 896 days since the last transportation bill expired in 2009.  Since then, it’s been coasting along on “extensions”.

The vote yesterday was a resounding 74-22 on this two year, $109 billion bill.  We had some serious concerns with the original bill language and the bill as passed is, admittedly, not perfect.  But with your help and working with our national partners, we were able to make improvements like:

  • Giving local governments and schools better access to funds for making bicycling safer
  • Saving the Recreational Trails Program, originally slated for elimination
  • Revising the mandatory sidepath law so that bicycles are not banned outright from federal roads (like national parks) with speed limits over 30 mph and with an adjacent paved path

Aside from these improvements, the Senate bill preserves dedicated funding for bicycling—like Safe Routes to School and Transportation Enhancements—now consolidated as “Additional Activities.”  I don’t love that name (additional? How about essential!), but I’m glad that we still have dedicated funding.  The bill is also a step forward for transit, important for many of us who combine transit with a bicycle to get where we’re going.  Both of our Senators voted for the bill.

Speaking of which, remember the “worst transportation bill ever”?  I wrote about it here.  It’s the House bill, and not only did it run out of gas, it never really had an engine or a steady pair of legs to pedal it.

The House is now tasked with writing something that has more than just the support of Speaker John Boehner.  Then the two bills will have to be reconciled before President Obama signs a new transportation bill into law.  There’s no clear path forward for the House—the failure of Boehner’s bill to even stand for a vote means that House leadership has to scramble to put something bipartisan together before the clock runs out.  As I said, they’re 896 days late.

With the need to actually write and pass a viable House bill and then settle it up with the Senate, another vote to extend the current bill—for the ninth time since 2009—looms.  March 31 is the deadline for a new bill or an extension or else transportation programs shut down and workers are laid off.

We favor a new bill modeled after the Senate bill that passed yesterday.  An extension would mean more fights to save funding for bicycling and waiting even longer to develop a real long-term vision for transportation in America.

Thanks to those of you who sent literally thousands of letters and emails to your members of Congress.  It made a real difference!

Burke-Gilman ruling: 18 of 19 ain’t good enough

Friday, February 17th, 2012 by

We’ve been around and around more times than a wheel on a century ride and, while we seem to make progress with each revolution, we’re not there yet.

Yesterday, King County Superior Court Judge Jim Rogers issued a decision on the Burke-Gilman Trail “Missing Link.”  The decision—his second—is the latest in a series of lawsuits brought on by the Ballard Business Appellants.  We’d been eagerly awaiting a decision on the case so the City of Seattle can stop with all the legal defense (yes, some of that is your money!) and move forward to finally complete the necessary safety improvements on the Missing Link.

I sat there yesterday morning as Judge Rogers announced his decision from the bench, at first listening to some favorable news.  Technically, he ruled in favor of 18 of 19 conclusions of the Hearing Examiner.  But Judge Rogers ruled against conclusion #9 of the Hearing Examiner’s ruling, asserting that, despite already being at a 10 percent level of design as is usual under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), further design details from the City of Seattle are necessary.

Back we go.  And yes, we’ve been here before.  Completing the Missing Link has been planned by the City since it agreed to acquire the abandoned rail line right of way from Burlington Northern Santa Fe in 1989.  It’s been stalled by lawsuits and appeals since 2003, mainly by a handful of businesses opposed to the corridor safety improvements.

So where are we?  Is this just another turn of the crank or are we actually getting somewhere?  Once SDOT fills in some of the details that Judge Rogers is looking for—and shows that the project will not pose a significant impact to the environment—it’ll likely go back to the Hearing Examiner for a third go.  Then back to Judge Rogers, also for the third time.

We’re disappointed for several reasons.  First, that despite piles of evidence to the contrary, there are still pockets of attitudes that bicycling and industry are incompatible.  Also, that we might miss this summer’s construction season due to more legal wrangling.  And finally, that we may see yet more unnecessary injuries on the tracks and along the corridor as this gets figured out.

So be careful out there and help us finish this up.  Please consider a gift today to support the Burke-Gilman Legal Defense Fund so we can ride this one out together and get a safer trail built.

Your waterfront

Monday, February 6th, 2012 by

How many times have you biked or walked along the Seattle waterfront, felt the salt in the air, listened to the gulls, looked out to the snowy Olympic Mountains and thought: what a city.

But despite this scene that many of us enjoy, it’s likely that you had to work a bit to get there—I always carry with me a feeling of disconnection from the natural beauty of Seattle’s waterfront.

That’s all about to change.  Maybe.

Still in the early stages of design, we’re unsure what kind of waterfront we’re going to get. (I’m surprised that the teaser images on the Waterfront Committee website don’t have a single bicycle in them.)

But we have a pretty good idea of what kind of waterfront we want: a safe and connected one that works for bicycle commuters, recreational riders and pedestrians.

Nice cycletrack-- but whoa, those are pretty long crossing distances across all those lanes...

Safe means that the crossing distances should be shorter for bicycles and pedestrians, traffic speeds should be below 30 mph and intersections should be carefully designed and signalized.

Connected means that the bicycle facilities should be wide to accommodate the large numbers of anticipated riders, the facilities should work for all types of riders and there should be strong east-west connections for all modes.

Tell the design team to get it right from the start. There’s a workshop that’ll start with a brief presentation and finish with an open discussion and a chance to speak up.  It’s 5:30 to 7 p.m. this Wednesday, Feb. 8 at Town Hall (downstairs, 1119 8th Avenue).  RSVP for the workshop here.

Let’s make sure that we make the best of this opportunity to connect to the tremendous natural beauty of our waterfront and create the kind of waterfront we’ve all been dreaming about.

No Federal Funding Says Committee

Thursday, February 2nd, 2012 by

As you might know, cities and towns across Washington rely on federal funding for programs like Safe Routes to School that build local, safe bicycle infrastructure for everyone. You also may know that we take the threat of zeroed out funding by Congress very seriously.  No federal funding would spell certain disaster for safer roads and accessibility to biking and walking.

So this week, we called on many of our supporters to take action on such a threat (that I previously wrote about here).  Thank you to those who contacted your Congressional representative to help us protect funding for bicycling.  We pushed hard but we didn’t get over the top of this vote.

Yes, unfortunately, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee voted against protecting bicycle funding.  It was a close, bipartisan vote: 27 to 29.

Washington state’s two committee members were split on an amendment introduced by Republican Tom Petri (R-WI) that would have restored Safe Routes to School and Transportation Enhancements programs.  Rick Larsen voted for the amendment.  Jaime Herrera Buetler voted against it. If you live in the 2nd district, be sure to thank Congressman Larsen.  If you live in the 3rd, we encourage you to reach out to Congresswoman Herrera Buetler and let her know of your disappointment.

Together, we generated over 900 emails to Congress—and while we didn’t get the result we wanted, we’re still in the fight.

What’s next?

The bill will probably pass a House floor vote void of any funding for bicycling.  But there is a silver lining.  Today’s bipartisan committee vote sends a strong signal to the Senate.  If a transportation bill is going to be worked out between the chambers, the Senate will see that funding for bicycling is supported by Democrats and Republicans across the aisle—and we should end up in a better place in the final compromise bill. That is, when or if we get one this (election) year.

We’ll continue to track this and give you a shout when things heat up again, since the results will directly impact what happens on the ground over the next several years in communities all across our state.

Thanks again to those 900 letter writers!