Archive for the ‘Advocacy’ Category

No Federal Funding Says Committee

Thursday, February 2nd, 2012 by John Mauro

As you might know, cities and towns across Washington rely on federal funding for programs like Safe Routes to School that build local, safe bicycle infrastructure for everyone. You also may know that we take the threat of zeroed out funding by Congress very seriously.  No federal funding would spell certain disaster for safer roads and accessibility to biking and walking.

So this week, we called on many of our supporters to take action on such a threat (that I previously wrote about here).  Thank you to those who contacted your Congressional representative to help us protect funding for bicycling.  We pushed hard but we didn’t get over the top of this vote.

Yes, unfortunately, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee voted against protecting bicycle funding.  It was a close, bipartisan vote: 27 to 29.

Washington state’s two committee members were split on an amendment introduced by Republican Tom Petri (R-WI) that would have restored Safe Routes to School and Transportation Enhancements programs.  Rick Larsen voted for the amendment.  Jaime Herrera Buetler voted against it. If you live in the 2nd district, be sure to thank Congressman Larsen.  If you live in the 3rd, we encourage you to reach out to Congresswoman Herrera Buetler and let her know of your disappointment.

Together, we generated over 900 emails to Congress—and while we didn’t get the result we wanted, we’re still in the fight.

What’s next?

The bill will probably pass a House floor vote void of any funding for bicycling.  But there is a silver lining.  Today’s bipartisan committee vote sends a strong signal to the Senate.  If a transportation bill is going to be worked out between the chambers, the Senate will see that funding for bicycling is supported by Democrats and Republicans across the aisle—and we should end up in a better place in the final compromise bill. That is, when or if we get one this (election) year.

We’ll continue to track this and give you a shout when things heat up again, since the results will directly impact what happens on the ground over the next several years in communities all across our state.

Thanks again to those 900 letter writers!

Funding for cycling in jeopardy: House vote Tomorrow

Wednesday, February 1st, 2012 by John Mauro

Anybody who’s been following the federal transportation drama knows that it’s been a saga of anxiety-provoking bill extensions with continued threats to funding for biking.  And then nothing.  And then something.  And then just kidding.

Is this your Congressional rep?

With your help, we’ve fended some of those threats off and have kept bike funding at current levels—still not nearly enough or equitable as I noted on Monday, but at least not as bloody as a Coen brothers movie.

But boy howdy, here we go.  The U.S. House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee is poised to rip everything out of the bill for bicycling (and walking) with a vote tomorrow.  I give you: the “American Energy and Infrastructure Act.”  And it gives you: nothing.

I bet you could have guessed that based on the ‘50s era title page of the summary alone.  Let’s see: transportation = oil pipeline + large concrete highway spans all superimposed on an American flag.  Um, that’s not my country thank you very much.

The details aren’t any better.  The bill looks like it will:

  • Kill programs “that do not have a federal interest”—like all bicycling programs. This means eliminating Transportation Enhancements and even Safe Routes to School.  Nothing should unite us in a fight like Congress going after kid safety.  Let me upgrade my piece on Monday from “Not. Fair.”  to “Simply. Disgusting.”
  • Reduce city and metro control over funding, giving more of it—“flexibility”—to state DOTs, which, in general, haven’t demonstrated strong support for bicycling
  • Gut or eliminate discretionary funds like the very successful TIGER program that Senator Patty Murray helped create
  • Squeeze the environmental review process, which will likely mean more impacts to our health and environmental health

So we need your help.  Click here to write your representative again today and ask for support to preserve funding for biking and walking >>

If this makes it out of the committee, what next?  It’ll go to the House floor for debate and likely get passed.  Then the bill would be conferenced with a Senate bill, MAP-21, if MAP-21 is passed by the Senate.  I wrote about MAP-21 when it was released in November; it certainly has its share of serious problems, but it doesn’t rip out all bike funding like the House bill.

Why bother with your representative?  While we’re not expecting a miracle for it to simply be rewritten or go away, a strong bipartisan showing in the House Transportation Committee means a better chance of working something reasonable out with the Senate.  Like something that doesn’t gut bike funding.  Like something that keeps our state, cities and towns building the protected bike lanes, cycle tracks and greenways for all of us to reliably and safely get around by bicycle.

And I’d vote for that.

Click here to write your representative today and ask for support to preserve funding for biking and walking >>

Two Reports You Should Read

Monday, January 30th, 2012 by John Mauro

It’s been a great couple of weeks for the data-hungry.

Last week, we learned that states spent an average of $2.17 for each of us on biking and walking, even though biking and walking account for 12% of all trips—and 14% of all traffic fatalities.

If you’re not paying attention, the take-away:  NOT.  FAIR.

Two other tidbits: Seattle ranks #4 in the nation for biking and walking (combined).  And an analysis of cost-benefit shows that every dollar we invest in bicycling and walking yields up to $11.80 in benefits!  Cha-ching.

Dig deeper into the Alliance for Biking and Walking 2012 Benchmarking Report here.

We’re trying to address that awful disparity in investment at the national level (with an upcoming vote in the House this week—stay tuned!) and at the local level, where cities and towns are taking big steps forward.  Seattle, for instance, is poised to start updating its Bicycle Master Plan to reflect breakthroughs in exciting new tools and engineering that weren’t around 5 years ago.  It’s our best opportunity in the next decade to create an inspiring vision for bicycling in Seattle—hopefully a vision that will help lead the nation and lead us to action.

But, yes, we do focus on cities and Seattle quite often.  (My bad—I live here and so do lots of our members.)   How about smaller cities and towns?

Enter the second big report.  Today, the Rails to Trails Conservancy released Active Transportation Beyond Urban Centers, which shows us that rates of bicycling and walking in smaller towns is surprisingly high.  Towns with between 10,000 and 50,000 citizens see the same basic number of trips per capita as larger urban areas.  This is important for many reasons, not the least is which is that accommodating and promoting bicycling isn’t an urban or rural thing, an eastside or westside thing, a red state or blue state thing—it’s the thing.  Especially with all the recent talk about the need for job creation (bicycling projects create more jobs per dollar than just about any type of roadway project), accommodating and promoting bicycling should be front and center as an urgent priority for cities, states and our country.  Period.

Enjoy the reports—they come with brief summaries if you’re in a hurry—and make sure to spread the insights!

Seattle Greenway Organizers – grassroots at its finest

Friday, January 27th, 2012 by Max Hepp-Buchanan

Less than a year after they officially started working together, the Seattle Greenway Organizers have their first big win! At the January 10 Seattle Greenways Coalition meeting on Beacon Hill, Councilmember Sally Bagshaw announced that the City will build seven miles of neighborhood greenways in 2012 (watch a video of her big announcement here).

Neighborhood Greenways are slow-speed, low-traffic residential streets installed with park-like amenities and ways to limit cut-through vehicle traffic. This is a new type of infrastructure to Seattle and one that is perfect for bicycle riders, pedestrians, and families that prefer a low-stress environment to get around their neighborhood.

Councilmembers Sally Bagshaw and Tom Rasmussen enjoying a ride with fellow greenway advocates on 18th Ave S on Beacon Hill. Photo by Dylan Ahearn.

Councilmember Bagshaw summed greenways up nicely: “Greenways connect parks and schools, community centers and neighborhood business districts. Neighborhood Greenways help with transportation, and they help with getting people where they want to go within their own communities.”

The neighborhoods that will almost definitely see greenways this year include Ballard, Beacon Hill, Greenwood, North Delridge, Wallingford, and the University District. There’s an additional four miles to be built in Laurelhurst, funded by Seattle Children’s Hospital.

And this is only the beginning. According to Councilmember Bagshaw, starting in 2013 the Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) will build 11 miles of greenways each year. Thanks to the Seattle Greenway Organizers, Seattle is on its way to having a network of greenways that rivals our romanticized bike city to the south, Portland.

[It’s worth noting that by 2015, 85 percent of all Portland residents will live within a half-mile of a greenway and that Portland’s traffic fatality rate is falling six times faster than the rest of the United States. Obviously, they are on to something.]

The type of grassroots organizing employed by the Seattle Greenway Organizers has clearly been very effective. They have done a great job of engaging people from different neighborhoods with unique skills and abilities to add even more power to their campaign. They have volunteers producing neighborhood maps highlighting potential future greenways, writing high-profile OpEds, and writing grant applications to secure funding. Beacon BIKES even went so far as to receive grant funding from the City of Seattle and hired Alta Planning + Design to produce Beacon Hill’s own neighborhood greenway plan, separate of what’s in the Seattle Bicycle Master Plan.

Truly, grassroots at its finest.

Speaking of the Seattle Bicycle Master Plan, it’s slated for a facelift this year and we have a unique opportunity to work together to massively improve upon what we did in 2007. Imagine an updated plan that has a greenways network in your neighborhood. Or cycle tracks to and through the downtown core a la New York City. This is our chance to envision and plan a Seattle that is safe, fun, and efficient for bicycle riders of all ages and abilities – one that encourages more people to get on their bikes for any trip.

If you are interested in helping make Seattle a world-class city for bicycling, stay tuned for ways to get involved. We’re gearing up now and will be rolling soon.

Environmental priorities are also our priorities – come to Environmental Lobby Day

Thursday, January 19th, 2012 by Max Hepp-Buchanan

Several months ago, Cascade Bicycle Club rejoined the Environmental Priorities Coalition after a year’s sabbatical. Since then, we have been working in Olympia with our allies at the Priorities Coalition and the Transportation for Washington campaign to ensure our state policy-makers pass legislation and a budget that builds a sustainable transportation future for Washington state.

A big environmental priority for us this year is Pollution-Free Prosperity. Our pro-bike agenda contributes to a clean and healthy environment, as the policies, projects and funding we work so hard to support at the state-level (and at all levels) help us reduce our dependence on oil and our global warming pollution.

Did you know that almost half of Washington state’s greenhouse gas emissions come from the transportation sector? Read more here.

That’s why in 2008, the State’s Transportation Implementation Working Group concluded that, “Washington State should make funding decisions and pursue revenue generating strategies that stimulate behaviors that support climate change solutions and that discourage behaviors that contribute to the problem.”

Enter the pro-bike agenda and our 2012 legislative priorities.

You have a unique opportunity next week to further enforce the connection between a clean and healthy environment and the pro-bike agenda in Olympia at Environmental Lobby Day.

What: Environmental Lobby Day
Where: Olympia, WA
When: Wednesday, Jan. 25

Much like Transportation Advocacy Day the following week, you will have the opportunity to meet legislators in person and advocate for policies that build a clean and efficient transportation system – a system that reduces our dependence on oil and contributes to a clean environment for all of us in Washington state.

RSVP for Environmental Lobby Day, and we’ll see you there!

Let’s finish what we started

Wednesday, January 11th, 2012 by Max Hepp-Buchanan

As Craig mentioned earlier this week, the gun has fired on the 2012 legislative session, and we are out of the saddle, cranking away at our priorities for the year. It’s a short session, which means we only have 60 days to accomplish what we want to get done – it also means we need your help more than ever to get us across the finish line victorious.

The first bill to break away from the pack is likely to be the Neighborhood Safe Speeds Bill (SHB 1217). SHB 1217 makes streets and neighborhoods safer by giving cities and towns the freedom to set speed limits to 20 miles per hour on non-arterial streets without a costly engineering and traffic study. It doesn’t mandate this change, but it does provide cities and towns the authority to do so without requiring a costly engineering or traffic study. If you would like more details – and reasons to support the bill – check out the one-pager published by the Bicycle Alliance of Washington (BAW).

This is a great bill and darn near everyone knows it – including our elected officials. Last year, thanks to the hard work of the BAW, the Neighborhood Safe Speeds Bill passed 92-0 out of the House. Nobody voted against it and only six representatives were absent – it was unanimous!

But it’s a new year and a new session and much has happened in Olympia since last February.

That is exactly why we need to remind our elected official now – in the first week of session – that SHB 1217 is a no-brainer. There’s a lot going on down there in the next 60 days and if we want to win we need to make our voices heard loud, early, and often.

Please take a minute to write your legislators and remind them of their good work last year on SHB 1217 – and that it’s time to finish the job.

And thank you for your good work.

Our response to Governor Gregoire’s Transportation Proposal

Tuesday, January 10th, 2012 by Craig Benjamin

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Today, Governor Chris Gregoire proposed a $3.6 billion package of transportation investments funded through a suite of fees. Building on the recommendations of the Connecting Washington task force, the proposed package prioritizes operations and maintenance while providing cities and counties with additional options to raise revenue for maintenance and transit.

“We commend Governor Gregoire for proposing a transportation package that prioritizes preserving and extending the life of our current transportation system,” said Chuck Ayers, Executive Director of Cascade Bicycle Club (Cascade). “We also commend the governor for proposing a revenue source that helps reduce our dependence on oil and for providing local jurisdictions with additional revenue options for supplementary improvements. We strongly agree with the governor that Washington needs to ‘build a transportation system that’s better than the other guys’; but that means we must do more than repair the crumbling relics of the past. Across America and around the world, cities, states and countries are investing in and prioritizing their bicycle, pedestrian and transit networks because they are the key to prosperity in the economy of the future; Washington must do the same.”

“Especially during these challenging economic times, if we are going to spend billions of limited taxpayer dollars on our transportation system, we must do more than tread water and maintain the status quo,” said Craig M. Benjamin, Policy and Government Affairs Manager for Cascade. “We should make smart, cost-effective investments that maximize the movement of people and goods in Washington state. Bicycle, pedestrian and transit projects reduce congestion and our dependence on oil, create more jobs than highway construction, improve public health, provide Washingtonians with more options to safely get where they need to go and prepare our state for the future. We thank Gov. Gregoire for starting this important conversation and look forward to working with the legislature and the governor to balance this package with adequate funding for the Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety, Safe Routes to School, Complete Streets & Main Street Highways and Regional Mobility grant programs.”

Contact: Craig M. Benjamin
Policy and Government Affairs Manager
Cascade Bicycle Club
(206) 713-6204
craig.benjamin@cascadebicycleclub.org

Help Piper, Join us at Transportation Advocacy Day

Monday, January 9th, 2012 by Craig Benjamin

Since last week, over 17,000 people read our message about helping Piper get the freedom to safely ride her bike around her neighborhood.

Over 17,000 people!

Maybe you were one of them.  Now imagine if just 6% of those people came to Olympia for Transportation Advocacy Day to say that they want safer communities for biking and walking.  Consider the impact of over 1,000 people walking into our state capitol and demanding that we as a state get serious about creating a better community through bicycling.  Think about the message that would send to our legislators; they would stand up and take notice.

Today marks the start of the 2012 legislative session, which is slated to last for 60 jam-packed days.  As we’ve mentioned before, this year’s legislative session brings unprecedented challenges, but also opportunities.  We’ve crafted our legislative agenda to seize these opportunities and help create a better community through bicycling, but to get things done, we’re going to need your help.  And one of the easiest, most fun, educational and empowering ways you can help is to join us on Jan. 31 in Olympia for Transportation Advocacy Day.

What’s Transportation Advocacy Day?  It’s your opportunity to join fellow advocates from across the state in lobbying your legislators for a better transportation future.  We’ll feed you breakfast, educate you on the political dynamics of the session and our legislative priorities, empower you with the tools to successfully lobby your legislators, feed you lunch, and provide you with a range of options for the afternoon from meeting with and lobbying your legislator to speaking with their assistant to attending (and even testifying!) at a hearing.

This year, in collaboration with our allies in the transportation and public health communities, we’ll be advocating for:

  • SHB 1217 – Neighborhood Safe Speeds bill, to make streets and neighborhoods safer by giving cities and towns the freedom to set speed limits to 20 miles per hour on non-arterial streets without a costly engineering and traffic study;
  • HB 1700 – Safe and Flexible Design Guidelines bill, which gives cities and counties the flexibility to use updated guidelines for designing bicycle and pedestrian projects, helping to increase safety and reduce project costs;
  • Adding health to Washington’s six transportation goals, which has the potential to save lives, improve health and safety and reduce health care costs by creating active transportation opportunities that prevent chronic diseases, improve air quality and reduce obesity; and
  • Supporting the Transportation for Washington principles of “Fix it first; save lives,” “More transit,” and “Building great, healthy communities.”

Fun, well organized, empowering and effective – that’s Transportation Advocacy Day in a nutshell.  And if you want to help give Piper (and everyone else) the freedom to safely ride her bike around her neighborhood, join us at Transportation Advocacy Day and let’s make it happen.

The conversation that we should have had

Monday, January 2nd, 2012 by John Mauro

Have you ever been talking with someone and, just when the conversation gets interesting, a casual glance at the clock results in a frantic “I’m late for a meeting!” or “I’m late for my bus!”  Or have you been watching your favorite TV show and, predictably but painfully, the plot thickens and it’s time for a commercial break?

Something like this happened to me in December.  It wasn’t a commercial break—but pretty close.

I was on The Conversation on KUOW.  Based on a recent Salon article, the subject was “Are Urban Bicyclists Just Elite Snobs?”  While I’m a fan of the show, I was disappointed that, as a show guest, I had exactly 124 seconds as part of the conversation. We barely had any time to dig in.  It left me—and many listeners, I’ve learned—with a disappointment that we just skimmed the surface and missed a good opportunity.

At Cascade, we’re committed to having the conversation about attitudes, perceptions, misperceptions and respect on the road for everyone.  So let’s create and sustain one here.  It’s a conversation that many of us want to have. And we should be able to have it without pulling together tight sound bytes or obeying a strict time limit.

To kick things off: Elite Snobs.

When I caught the article, my first reaction—to the headline—was disappointment.  How can our beloved easy and cheap mode of transportation (or popular form of recreation) be anything close to a central character in a social hierarchy struggle?

Bicycling is more normal and ordinary than ever, so I tire of the notion that bicycling is only for one group of people.  When we look at the numbers, we find it to be completely false.  In fact, when we look at the census data, those who ride bikes span income levels quite evenly.  Are there elite snobs who ride a bike?  Are you an elite snob?  Better yet, who actually cares?  The real question isn’t about snobbery, it’s whether or not we’re going to recognize the serious interest of all ages, races, incomes and backgrounds in this cheap and easy way to get around and make sure it’s safe and accessible for everyone. And beyond recognizing this increasing demand by the masses—people really want to ride—will our city’s leaders build the infrastructure and let us?

Rant over; I then actually read the article.  Beyond the snarky headline, the Salon article does dig in.  The author even calls the media to the carpet and notes the disparity in enforcement and rash of hyperbolic headlines (um, his is a case in point).  Its thesis is that it’s not so much that bicyclists are elitists, but that we’re saddled with that unfortunate and ironically poor public perception.  Okay, good point.  Next?

Next Stop: Us vs. Them

Poor public perception?  But we are the public.  And let’s take that back.  This is not a divide between completely different segments of society.  This is the case of people forgetting who our neighbors are, who our friends are, who our coworkers are. In some cases, it’s a case of people even forgetting who they are: we’ve seen people stake claims of one kind of biking or one kind of appropriate bicycle clothing over the other.  Bicyclists aren’t bicyclists.  They’re people of all types who ride bicycles.  And any conversation—like the one on KUOW—that pits one side against another side isn’t going to get real far.  There are no “sides.”  We need to recognize that there are groups, associations and differences—that we’ve got individuality but also similarity.  When we see this common Us vs. Them circular, unproductive chatter happen, we need to break the cycle.

Let’s Be Honest: We’re Afraid

Being on the road can be scary.  Almost all of us know someone who has been injured or killed while riding or driving, no doubt.  So while even though many people aren’t fully aware of the risk of distracted, drunk or inattentive driving/riding, I’d bet that most of us carry around a bit of fear with us.  It’s why my wife always tells me to “be safe out there” before I ride to work or drive anywhere.

And, sure.  None of us wants to make a mistake and hurt someone.  So as we’re trying our best to get where we’re going safely, someone (on bike or in car) who throws an unpredictable or sudden movement, stretches a yellow light or rolls through a red can get our adrenaline going.  And while I’m tempted to think that this is truer for the most vulnerable users of the road like those on bikes or on foot, we can’t dismiss that many motorists (including us when we’re driving) are truly afraid to cause harm.

Enter a stressful situation with the background of fear and it can move suddenly into anger and blame.  If you’re anything like me (and I’m loath to admit), when you’re pushed too far, it’s often the other person’s fault.  Ah, a simple projection gives temporary relief.  Taken together, the Us vs. Them and fear-turned-anger might result in some people blaming the bicyclist for simply existing and refusing to recognize the rights of bikes to exist on our roadways.

Rising Above: A Better Dance

At the risk of alienating the junior high crowd, how many tiny trips to Facebook do you need to make to remember how much we all really just wanted to be liked back then?  Think junior high school dances.  And while I’d like to think that we’ve learned some things along the way, maybe even matured a little, it’s probably still true.

We’re never going to be able to reason with those who blame us for simply existing.  But it can’t start from there with everyone and need to reset the conversation to calm, civil and mature.  We are all legitimate users of our public infrastructure.

So let’s acknowledge our long-standing desire to be liked and also use this maturity.  It might, in combination, get us to a place of being respected if we can elevate the blame game to an honest discussion about the needs of all road users.

Finally: Ride

Aside from stopping the blame game and agreeing to engage in a calm, civil and mature conversation with and within the community, you already know the best way to contribute toward a solution: ride.  (And, of course, let’s also remember that when we’re driving a car, we’re piloting what can be seen legally as a dangerous weapon.  So let’s drive with extreme care.)

Yes, there’s a sentiment that bicycle evangelists are trying to convert the masses from the sins of car driving and that we’re a preachy, holier-than-thou bunch.  Let’s not get stuck here.  No one wants to be told what to do—but if everyone is doing it and it looks fun and easy, well, why wouldn’t people give it a try?  Let’s lead by example—in word and in deed—and ride.

The more of us who ride make it safer for everyone on the road and more likely that we’ll push ourselves over the tipping point and into a city and region where bicycling is an ordinary as using a vacuum cleaner.  And a place where, as Bike Snob NYC wrote “humanity will marvel that there was once an age in which a mode of transportation as inexpensive and accessible as the bicycle was considered ‘elitist.’”

Getting There: Section of Burke-Gilman Opens Today

Friday, December 23rd, 2011 by John Mauro

As we reported last week, work on the Burke-Gilman trail in Lake Forest Park is starting to wrap up.  A large section—from Log Boom Park to Ballinger Way—will open today at noon.

If you’re not already en route, jockeying to be the first one on the 0.7 miles of fresh pavement, what do you have to look forward to?  You’ll see wider pavement, safety improvements, new lighting, better crossings and fencing.  You’ll also see the disappearance of those temporary stairs.

While we continue to cross our fingers for a holiday miracle, the rest of the 2.2 miles will likely open in about five weeks.  Stay tuned or follow along on the King County Parks project website.