Archive for the ‘Missing Link’ Category

Burke-Gilman Trail Missing Link: Back in Superior Court #CompleteTheTrail

Thursday, December 15th, 2011 by John Mauro

Tomorrow is another milestone for the Burke-Gilman Missing Link: another argument, back in King County Superior Court.  Yes, we’ve been here before, but haven’t we argued enough over this missing section of trail?  Or, better yet, how many times do we have to win the argument, and when do we get on with the business of finally building a safe section of trail?

The end is in sight, and we hope this is the last time.  But this seemingly endless cycle of appeals could actually continue.  (And rack up tens of thousands of dollars of additional legal fees for Cascade.  You can help us to victory with a gift to the Education Foundation today!)

As we continue down the legal path, the plot hasn’t dramatically changed.  We continue to believe that the trail section is a necessary safety improvement and connects up the backbone of our regional trail system.  The Ballard Business Appellants keep arguing that a trail would case significant traffic delays, parking loss, incompatibility with land use and wouldn’t be safe.

The quick synopsis. The City went back to study the route yet again a few hearings ago (due to concerns of “piece mealing” the analysis) and still determined that the trail would not cause significant environmental impacts.  Then on July 1 of this year, the Hearing Examiner (think of her like a judge) ruled that there will be no “probable significant adverse environmental impacts.”  The Ballard Business Appellants then appealed the Hearing Examiner’s ruling, which brings us to Superior Court tomorrow.  If we win yet again, the Ballard Business Appellants could appeal the forthcoming decision from Superior Court to the Court of Appeals or to the State Supreme Court.

Again, we hope this is the last time we have to win so we can get on with it.  As I’ve mentioned before, the City has been “eager to begin construction on a fully funded and fully designed ‘missing link’ segment,” according to SDOT.

We’ve got our eyes on the 2012 summer construction season.  It’d be a great time to celebrate.  We love ribbon cuttings.

We’ll be live-tweeting from the courtroom tomorrow starting at 2 p.m. Follow us on Twitter to hear how it’s going under #CompleteTheTrail. Please join in and share your thoughts on what this project means to you.

Please help us continue the fight for the Missing Link.  Your gift to the Education Foundation today will ensure we win!

Ballard Bridge repainting project

Saturday, November 12th, 2011 by Stephanie Frans

Ask a roomful of Seattle bicyclists to identify dangerous places to ride a bike, and the Ballard Bridge will quickly rise to the top of the list, second only to its notorious neighbor, the Missing Link.

Bicyclists just looking for an excuse to avoid the Ballard Bridge will be pleased to hear that the bascule portion will be undergoing a six-week repainting project starting the week of November 14.

The project will require closures of one sidewalk and adjacent travel lane at a time, starting on the east side of the bridge. SDOT has established bicycle detours via the Fremont Bridge (~ 4.5 miles) and the Locks (~ 3.5 miles).  While the extra distance may not be convenient, nor the detour segment along the Missing Link safe, neither is riding on steel bridge grating that is slicker than snot .

Plus, consider that the Fremont Bridge detour offers multiple bonus features that ARE bike-friendly. Depending on your route, you can ride the brand spankin’ new ship canal trail, the redesigned Nickerson Street or the mighty fine buffered bike lanes along Dexter Avenue.

Of course, while the painting project may enhance the aesthetics and extend the lifespan of the Ballard Bridge, biking across won’t be any prettier afterward. Fortunately, Seattle’s Bike Master Plan is scheduled for an update in 2012, which will be an important opportunity to identify key enhancements to improve bicycle safety on this – and all – of Seattle’s bridges and roadways.

photo: Grant M. Haller, Seattle Post-Intelligencer

Ready... GO!photo: Grant M. Haller, Seattle Post-Intelligencer

Vote YES on Proposition 1 – Keep Seattle Moving

Monday, September 12th, 2011 by Craig Benjamin

Cascade Bicycle Club is proud to announce our endorsement of Proposition 1, the ballot measure that will create a better transportation future for Seattle.

Cascade played a significant role in the development of Prop. 1. In fact, you could say that Cascade has been working toward this moment for over three decades.

I grew up in Broadview, tucked away in the northwest corner of Seattle. We didn’t have sidewalks in Broadview growing up. Heck, our street wasn’t even paved until my parents got together with our neighbors to form our own one street local improvement district.

As a kid, my bicycle was my ticket to freedom. It allowed me to go visit my friends all over the neighborhood and I could always tell where my friends were hanging out by the pile of bikes in the front yard. But we never rode our bikes outside of the quiet streets of Broadview. It just wasn’t safe.

It was more than my bicycle, however, that gave my friends and me the opportunity to explore our city. We used to take the bus to Southeast Seattle to visit our friends from school and to Northgate to try to meet girls (we normally failed). Taking the bus from one corner of the city to the other took nearly half the day, which didn’t leave us with much time to hang out.

Five years ago my wife Stacy and I moved back to Seattle so that we could start a family, and I could attend the Evans School of Public Affairs and learn how to create a better future. Returning to my childhood home three decades later, Broadview still has no sidewalks, it’s still not safe for kids to ride their bikes around Seattle, and it still takes half the day to take the bus from one corner of our city to the other.

Yes, we’ve made a lot of progress as a city. We adopted a Bicycle Master Plan and have taken significant steps forward in building out our bicycle infrastructure. We built a light rail line and have plans to dramatically expand the network. We adopted one of the most progressive Pedestrian Master Plans in the country (and then forgot to fund it). But at the end of the day, Seattle still has a long way to go to become the type of city we know it should be.

Stacy and I learned this first hand. We lucked into a place three blocks up the hill from the Locks in Ballard. The 44 ran two blocks from our front door to half a block from the Evans School. But when I took the bus to and from class, it kept taking me an hour to go five miles. So I decided to try riding my bike. Despite one large missing link, I could take the Burke-Gilman directly across town to school in under half an hour. The second day I was riding to class I got hit by a car. I was fine. Both the driver and I made mistakes that resulted in the incident. It was a giant wake up call.

Stacy wasn’t so lucky. She landed a job just up the hill from Gasworks, almost directly on the Burke. She’s not really a cyclist, but given that there’s not a good way to take the bus from our home to her work and $4 a gallon gas makes driving incredibly expensive, she decided to give riding a try. On her first attempt she got run off the road. That’s the last time Stacy ever rode her bike in Seattle.

But for me, bicycling was the only way I could get around. We could only afford one car so riding my bike was simply the fastest (and often only) way for me to get to work or school. After both Stacy and my incidents, I sought out and received an appointment to Seattle’s Bicycle Advisory Board because I wanted to help make our streets safer for bicyclists. There I had an incredible opportunity to work with passionate volunteers learning the ins and outs of bicycling in Seattle. The most important thing I learned was that we need a lot more money for bicycling facilities (a whole lot more) if we want to get serious about making bicycling a realistic option for people like Stacy who want to ride, but just aren’t safe.

Even though it seems everyone in Seattle talks about how we should be a city where everyone has the freedom to safely walk, bike, drive, or take transit to get where they need to go, for whatever reason, we aren’t aligning our infrastructure investments with this vision. We’re not spending our money in a manner which will create the future we want to live in.

This is exactly why I was proud to join with the Cascade Bicycle Club in launching the Streets For All Seattle campaign last year. We believed that the time had arrived for our city to get serious about funding the pedestrian, bicycle and transit infrastructure that our citizens demand and build a transportation system that will make Seattle work for our future.

We built a coalition of over 60 community, labor, business, political, transportation and environmental organizations who shared our vision of Seattle being a city where everyone has the freedom to safely walk, bike, drive, or take transit to get where they need to go. We set out to engage the entire city in a conversation about how we can build a better transportation future and give our elected officials the support they need to do the right thing.

We made things happen. We pushed the Seattle City Council to create a Transportation Benefit District to fund pedestrian and bicycle improvements and support basic street maintenance, and to form the Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee III (CTAC III), asking them to undertake a full review of the city’s transportation funding system and evaluate the potential for a ballot measure asking Seattle voters to fund additional transportation projects.

CTAC III performed a comprehensive review of how Seattle can fund and build a transportation system that will work for the future. When they reached out to and listened to the people of Seattle they heard some common themes: We want more walkable streets, family-friendly bicycle infrastructure, faster, more reliable buses, and streets that aren’t littered with potholes. More importantly, we expressed a willingness to pay for these investments because they would help us become the city we know we should be. Cascade had a seat at the CTAC III table and learned a ton through this conversation.

After crunching the numbers, reviewing the plans, and listening to the people, CTAC III asked the City Council to give Seattle voters the opportunity to vote yes on a package that would raise considerable funds for walking, biking and transit infrastructure, along with significant money to fix and maintain Seattle streets.

The City Council did their jobs, tweaking and refining CTAC III’s recommendation into Proposition 1, and on Aug. 16, they unanimously voted to send it to the November ballot.

Proposition 1 will give Seattle faster, more reliable transit service; repaired and repaved roads that work better for everyone; and new sidewalks, better crosswalks, and more family-friendly bike infrastructure. Now, we’ve transformed Streets For All Seattle from a coalition working toward a shared vision into the campaign to pass Proposition 1, a package of investments that will help achieve our shared vision.

It was an easy decision for Cascade to endorse Proposition 1. It 1 will generate $14 million for bicycle infrastructure over the next ten years. That’s enough to build twenty miles of neighborhood greenways and forty miles of bike lanes and sharrows. It will dramatically accelerate the implementation of the Bicycle Master Plan (and the Transit and Pedestrian Master plans) and provide the funding necessary for Seattle to start building separated facilities for the thousands of people like Stacy who want to ride, but just aren’t safe. Hopefully, it will help prevent more tragic and unnecessary deaths.

Proposition 1 is too modest of a package to solve all of our transportation problems, but it’s an opportunity to create a better transportation future. An opportunity to start becoming a city where we can rely on the bus to get us to work on time, the roads are smooth, and our children can ride their bikes to school.

If you’re reading this blog you probably care about creating a better community through bicycling. That’s exactly what Proposition 1 will do. We’ve got let than two months to get this done, please join us and let’s make it happen.

We’re kicking off the campaign on Tuesday, Sept. 13, 6 p.m., at the Moe Bar on Capitol Hill (1425 10th Ave); I hope to see you there.

And if you would like to volunteer, please email Cascade Advocacy Campaigns Manager, Max Hepp-Buchanan or give him a call at (206) 226-1040.

Burke-Gilman Missing Link: Chapter 516 – A victory and one step closer

Friday, July 15th, 2011 by John Mauro

Many Ballard groups gathered on Tuesday, 27 October 2009, to demonstrate and rally for the completion of the "Missing Link" of the Burke-Gilman Trail. (Flickr photo by by Holy Outlaw)

Imagine your dream bike, whatever it might be: the perfect type, the perfect fit, the perfect shape, the best components—and the perfect color.  It’s sunny, 80 degrees, no wind and you’re about to ride it for the first time.  You roll it out and are just about to hop on and you notice, just in time, one critical thing: no seat post and no saddle.  All the bike shops in the city are closed, your friends are all out riding, your other saddle went missing and you’re out of luck.

To me and many, the Burke-Gilman trail is our region’s crown jewel of trails.  It supports tremendous numbers and diversity of use and is a backbone of our nonmotorized infrastructure.  But while most of it is in beautiful shape, there’s that one critical missing part: the Missing Link.  Try to ride your bike through here and it’s often painful.

Fortunately, each day we are closer to finding that saddle and seat post.

Score one for the home team when, once again, a Hearing Examiner (think of her like a judge) ruled in our favor—namely that there will be no “probable significant adverse environmental impacts” from the construction of that tiny but essential trail section.  Among other things, four main points stand out about the City’s second environmental review which was under appeal:

  1. Construction of the Shilshole section won’t cause traffic impacts or hazards like overall average peak hour delays at driveways due to proposed sight distance, width or design.
  2. Construction of the trail won’t cause significant parking loss.
  3. Construction of the trail is compatible with existing or zoned land use.
  4. Construction of a 2-way multi-use trail won’t be inherently unsafe.

I like all of them, but I really like #4.  And here’s why.  A professionally designed trail segment will result in a safer route for all users, so we’ll stop seeing the crashes at the tracks each week, the close-calls with cars doing U-turns in the unmarked space adjacent to the parking spaces and other dicey encounters.  You’d even be able to bike with your kids out to Golden Gardens without fearing for your—or their—safety.

And the Burke-Gilman will be complete.

But even as we keep jumping these costly hurdles that are thrown up in the way of this vision, we’ve still got a few more.

The recent hearing examiner decision doesn’t preclude another appeal by the Ballard Business Appellants.  Another appeal would throw the decision back to King County Superior Court Judge Rodgers in another 5 or 6 months.  The Appellants have until July 22 to file, and I bet they will.  Judge Rogers’ decision could then be appealed to the court of appeals or the state supreme court—so we might not be done quite yet. All the while, and for the past 10 years, the City has been “eager to begin construction on a fully funded and fully designed ‘missing link’ segment,” according to SDOT.

On another front, there’s been talk of striking a deal.  According to this piece, “they are working on a “cycle track” solution for the Burke Gilman Trail – one that will take bicyclists through the business district and not affect the maritime industry.”

I’ve seen this solution.  It may well find momentum in the coming years as a way to continue Ballard’s rise as a vibrant, prosperous and active urban center.  We’re listening and we’re interested. But it’s not the Burke Gilman Trail—it will serve a different purpose; it’s unfunded (unlike the Missing Link) and it lacks any professional engineering design. Consequently, it will take years to complete—and we don’t have years before the next person falls on the tracks or is seriously injured because the present design of Shilshole simply doesn’t work for all road users. To me, it reads as no cash and a need for far more time—a bad combination.

To close, a few words about the maritime industry in Ballard.  I grew up in Maine and understand that the maritime industry is at once fragile and robust, strong and struggling, dependent and autonomous.  Cascade and our community support not just our local maritime identity, but the family-wage jobs and families that depend on them.

It’s just that we don’t believe in the false dichotomy between safety for all and economic vitality.  We want both.

Literally last week, I came across two women with rental bikes and an extended Seattle Bicycle Map—likely with no knowledge of the history of our maritime industry and the length of this particular trail battle—standing at the very edge of the Missing Link next to the Fred Meyer parking lot.  They asked me how to get to the locks and to Golden Gardens.  And they asked if they had to bike on to a road with cars to get there.  I told them, “Yes, you do. For now.  But soon you’ll be able to ride there on the trail.”

Yes, perhaps soon.  I should have added that there’s a bike shop on the other side that sells the nicest saddles and a heck of a seat post.

Breaking: Missing Link opponent’s appeal dismissed

Friday, September 17th, 2010 by David Hiller

Salmon Bay Sand and Gravel and other  Ballard businesses opposed to safety improvements, including the long-overdue completion of the “missing link” of the Burke-Gilman Trail, along Shilshole Ave in Ballard were dealt another blow in the courts.

After last summer’s decision in King County Superior Court, which sided with the city and Cascade Bicycle Club on eight of nine complaints, the judge remanded the environmental review to the city so that they could study the 0.3 miles of Shilshole Ave that hadn’t been evaluated.  Even though the next phase of the environmental review has yet to be completed, trail-opponents rushed to appeal Judge Rogers ruling on the eight complaints where he found in Cascade’s favor.

Today, the Court  dismissed Salmon Bay’s appeal. While Salmon Bay may ask the panel of the three judges assigned to the case to modify the commissioner’s order, it is unlikely that they would.

As for the status of the project, it is our understanding that the required additional environmental review is almost complete and that the city is looking at issuing a new threshold determination on full project, including the so-called permanent route on Shilshole Ave NW, by sometime in December.

From there we will likely have to go before the Hearing Examiner once again and then back to Judge Rogers courtroom.  [Edit:] SDOT intends to see through the full appellate process before the trail is built.

Thank you to everyone who rallied in support of trail completion.

How the Green Route Got the Green Light

Thursday, April 29th, 2010 by Chris Rule
The "Green Route" along Shilshole Ave had the fewest intersections by an order of magnitude.

The "Green Route" along Shilshole Ave had the fewest intersections by an order of magnitude.

Controversy continues over completing the Missing Link of the Burke-Gilman Trail, as opponents of the planned and funded trail released an idea for an alternative cycletrack down busy Leary Way and Market Street.

While improvements to Market and Leary should be explored, there are several challenges that make Leary-Market a poor substitute for the plan approved by the city council, funded, designed and exhaustively studied over the past decade.  For guidance, let’s turn to the Ballard Corridor Study, performed in 2002-2003 while the city was trying to find best route to place the trail.  A full PDF is here, and you can read a wealth of other information about the project at SDOT’s Burke-Gilman Trail Extension Projects page.

SDOT looked at three possible routes for the trail – the “Green Route” is the permanent route currently proposed, while the Red route travels mostly on Ballard Avenue and Market Street and the Blue route is a more circuitous one through the neighborhood.  The map does not do a good job of showing that there are limited crossings of 15th Ave NW underneath and north of the Ballard Bridge – this constrains the choice of alternatives.

Some of the routes considered to complete the "Missing Link"

Some of the routes considered to complete the "Missing Link"

First, a couple of facts to be aware of.  Collisions are much more likely to occur at intersections, and the biggest factor in crash severity is speed.  While a pedestrian struck by a car traveling 20mph will likely survive, but higher speeds are exponentially dangerous.  By 40 mph, a car will be deadly to a vulnerable road user 90% of the time.

SDOT studied factors including vehicle speeds, the number of vehicles, and the number of intersections and driveway crossings for each route.  The Green Route won on all these criteria.

First, the planned route travels along the rail right of way near the shoreline, rather than on arterial streets.  This reduced the number of driveways and intersections by an order of magnitude over any other alternative.  But the Green Route still does cross several industrial driveways, so studies were performed on two where the business owners were most concerned.  SDOT found that for businesses like Ballard Oil that cross the rail alignment, more design work was warranted, and has been completed for the section of trail closest to the Locks.  Along Shilshole, the about 16 trucks per hour were entering and leaving Salmon Bay Sand and Gravel between 7 and 9am on weekdays, and ultimately the department recommended an interim detour to Ballard Avenue along their operations until the permanent route could be designed in a context-sensitive way.

As for vehicle volumes and speeds, the Green Route again was the alternative that minimized those challenges.  Along NW 45th Street (near the Fred Meyer), speeds and volumes are much lower than the parallel arterial on 46th  that now hosts the Ballard Blocks development (Trader Joes, LA Fitness, etc.).  Likewise, Leary Way, Market St. , and 15th Ave NW are streets to avoid because of average speeds around 35mph and much higher vehicle volumes.  The Red Route, Blue Route and now the Leary-Market cycletrack proposed by the appellants against the city’s plan are all problematic for these reasons.

The Burke-Gilman Trail serves a variety of users, of all ages and abilities, and even their pets.  The city planned and designed its solution for the “Missing Link” over many years, and considering safety for all users through this corridor as its top priority.  In addition to safety considerations, the Green Route also was the most continuous, most closely resembled other parts of the existing trail, and is the shortest one possible since it hugs the rail line.  For instance, the blue route would add another mile to what is only a 1.5-mile gap.  Thus, the Green Route is likely to draw many more users than any other alternative.

Judge Jim Rogers ruled recently that for the parts of the trail the city has designed, they have done due diligence in their environmental analysis .  However, SDOT did not study the portion of what’s defined as the “permanent” Green Route that travels past its most prominent opponent. Salmon Bay Sand and Gravel was not satisfied with the Ballard Avenue compromise.  Rogers ruled that the city must do this planning now, although there is currently no timeline for constructing a trail there.

Despite this protracted legal challenge, we see a light at the end of the tunnel.  SDOT is performing the required environmental checklist along the undesigned portion of the “permanent” route over the next several weeks.  If they do not find that there are likely significant environmental impacts, they will be able to go to bid on the trail project.

Set back for safety on the Missing Link

Friday, April 16th, 2010 by M.J. Kelly

News from the courthouse. Though Judge James Rogers ruled against Salmon Bay Sand and Gravel and the Ballard Chamber of Commerce on eight of nine issues, that ninth issue ripped the wheel out from under us. Judge Rogers remanded the Determination of Non Significance (DNS), requiring a permanent route to be analyzed. In effect, he overturned last year’s decision by Seattle Hearing Examiner Sue Tanner upholding the city’s environmental analysis. The timeline is indeterminiate.

What does this mean? As it’s their stated strategy to keep the Missing Link blocked any way they can, we fully expect the Ballard businesses to appeal the judge’s decision on the other eight issues, which would add further delay and expose more people to injuries.

One step forward, 12 steps back.

Nearly three decades have passed since BNSF abandoned a short rail siding in Ballard and the city of Seattle proposed constructing the facility now known as the Burke-Gilman Trail.  During those intervening years, many things have changed in Ballard.  What has stayed the same is the decrepit, deteriorating and unsafe conditions between two of Seattle’s most vibrant neighborhoods.

How many more people need to be injured and how much more money must be wasted before progress can be made?

Thank you to everyone who supported and defended the Missing Link over many years. Sadly, we are not done.

Video From Missing Link Rally

[Read more history on the Missing Link hearings...]

We Are The Missing Link

Monday, March 22nd, 2010 by Chris Rule

Video From Missing Link Rally

Last year, Cascade intervened on behalf of the City of Seattle to get the “Missing Link” of the Burke-Gilman Trail completed.  And in a ruling from the Seattle Hearing Examiner we won – big. Her ruling confirmed that the City had done its work properly and had the right to complete the trail.

One would think that the Missing Link would soon no longer be “missing.” But the small group of Ballard businesses that filed (and lost) the original suit to stop completion of the Burke-Gilman Trail have appealed, and we’re not done yet.

In October, fifteen local organizations and nearly 300 people stood up and declared,We are the Missing Link. You can see a short video from the event here. We all have a stake in the trail, as a catalyst for community, as an essential transportation corridor, and as a symbol of our progress in improving bicycling facilities.

It’s Not Over Yet

Last Friday afternoon, we headed back to court to defend the trail project against another legal challenge.  The appellants raised the same tired argument that the trail would put them out of business – blatant hypocrisy, since one of these businesses moved their operations next to another section of trail 13 years ago without incident.

The attorneys representing Salmon Bay, one of these appellants, went so far as to publicly question the Hearing Examiner’s objectivity, and said that they will appeal all the way to the Supreme Court if they have to.  What won’t they say and do to get their way?

Last year we spent $24,014 in legal fees. And this year we have already racked up another $7,953. Many of you took action, collectively giving $17,075 to the Burke-Gilman Legal Defense Fund. Your donations support our work. But there is more work to be done.

Completing the Missing Link of the Burke-Gilman Trail NOW is crucial to improve safety for bicyclists, pedestrians and all users of the road.

You can help us complete the Missing Link. The cost in injuries is too great to ignore. No gift is too small or too large. Your donation directly helps pay our legal fees, but more importantly, your giving reminds us that, together, we can make a difference.

Burke-Gilman: Good for Business?

Monday, March 1st, 2010 by Chris Rule

The Burke-Gilman Missing Link has returned to the news over the last few weeks after several injured bicyclists filed a lawsuit against the City of Seattle.  Ironically, the city wants to fix the area and make it safer but has been hampered from doing so by another lawsuit from the Ballard Chamber of Commerce, Salmon Bay Sand & Gravel, Ballard Oil and the BINMIC Action Fund.  The next chapter of the Missing Link story begins Friday, March 5 in King County Superior Court.

You may have signed our petition to get the appellants to drop their case, but unfortunately that has not occurred.  The appellants have filed a flurry of legal briefs that make the same tired arguments about bike trails being incompatible with industrial areas.  In further irony, Salmon Bay is bankrolling the lawsuit, but chose to locate a facility where it stores its signature white and orange-striped trucks directly adjacent to the trail at Kvichak marina.

kvichak seattle - Google MapsAs one rides or walks from Ballard to Fremont along the trail, there are numerous places where trucks, bicyclists and pedestrians interact near industrial facilities.  There is even an asphalt plant with its tall profile next to the Ship Canal.  City Dept. of Transportation trucks can regularly be seen pulling in and out.  This plant is operated by Lakeside Industries (great photo on this blog), a family-owned local business that has won awards for its commitments to safety and the environment.  Lakeside also donated 40 acres of land near the Sammamish River Trail to Woodinville, doubling the amount of open space there.

Contrast this with Salmon Bay, which was recently fined $12,000 for environmental violations.

Missing Link — New hearing date

Friday, February 19th, 2010 by M.J. Kelly
Missing Link slide show

Missing Link slide show

On July 15, 2009, we learned that Cascade Bicycle Club and the City of Seattle are being sued by a coalition of Ballard industrial businesses, industrial associations and the Ballard Chamber of Commerce. The lawsuit is an appeal to the Superior Court and challenges the city’s plans to complete the “Missing Link” of the Burke-Gilman Trail. The project would improve traffic management and allow for improved safety and access for all users — pedestrians, bicycles, cars and trucks — through the corridor.

The original hearing before Judge Rodgers was originally scheduled for Monday, Feb. 22, but has been continued (read: delayed, but due to a different case) to Friday, March 5 at 9 a.m.

Stay tuned.