Archive for the ‘Missing Link’ Category

As the Missing Link designs get sent back again, something must be done to improve safety

Thursday, August 30th, 2012 by

On Tuesday, Aug. 27, the City of Seattle Hearing Examiner disappointingly ruled in favor of the Ballard Business Appellants by sending the updated design for the Missing Link stretch of the Burke-Gilman Trail back to the Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) for a full Environmental Impact Statement. 

The Missing Link section of the Burke-Gilman Trail refers to the area where the trail ends at Ballard’s Fred Meyer and people are left to find their own route to the Chittenden Locks where the trail picks up again. The Missing Link also includes the most dangerous rail road track crossings in the city, on Shilshole Avenue below the Ballard Bridge, which is the cause of numerous bicycle crashes every year.

For years, the City has been eager to begin construction on the fully funded Missing Link segment, but the process has continuously been stalled by a string of lawsuits by the Ballard Business Appellants, which includes the Ballard Chamber of Commerce and businesses like Ballard Oil and Salmon Bay Sand & Gravel.

Earlier this year, SDOT once again reissued a revised Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) on the Missing Link design after King County Superior Court Judge Rogers requested further study. In submitting the revised DNS, SDOT determined that “this proposal still will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment”.

However, at a third go at the Hearing Examiner’s office this past week, the Examiner disagreed with SDOT, stating that the Shilshole Avenue Segment of the Burke-Gilman completion project will create “significant adverse impacts in the form of traffic hazards” due to conflicts between truck movements and trail users.

“We are disappointed,” said Chuck Ayers, Executive Director of Cascade Bicycle Club. “The Missing Link continues to be a major safety concern, and this setback perpetuates the problems that already exist with the rail road tracks, navigation, and interaction between road users.”

While it is up to the City now to determine where they want to go from here, Ayers hopes to see a quick response from the City.

“We want to see fast action to bring all the stakeholders together to discuss our options. Something has to be done to improve the safety on the Missing Link segment until a trail is built,” said Ayers. “We hope the City will do whatever is legally required to move the project forward.”

Burke-Gilman ruling: 18 of 19 ain’t good enough

Friday, February 17th, 2012 by

We’ve been around and around more times than a wheel on a century ride and, while we seem to make progress with each revolution, we’re not there yet.

Yesterday, King County Superior Court Judge Jim Rogers issued a decision on the Burke-Gilman Trail “Missing Link.”  The decision—his second—is the latest in a series of lawsuits brought on by the Ballard Business Appellants.  We’d been eagerly awaiting a decision on the case so the City of Seattle can stop with all the legal defense (yes, some of that is your money!) and move forward to finally complete the necessary safety improvements on the Missing Link.

I sat there yesterday morning as Judge Rogers announced his decision from the bench, at first listening to some favorable news.  Technically, he ruled in favor of 18 of 19 conclusions of the Hearing Examiner.  But Judge Rogers ruled against conclusion #9 of the Hearing Examiner’s ruling, asserting that, despite already being at a 10 percent level of design as is usual under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), further design details from the City of Seattle are necessary.

Back we go.  And yes, we’ve been here before.  Completing the Missing Link has been planned by the City since it agreed to acquire the abandoned rail line right of way from Burlington Northern Santa Fe in 1989.  It’s been stalled by lawsuits and appeals since 2003, mainly by a handful of businesses opposed to the corridor safety improvements.

So where are we?  Is this just another turn of the crank or are we actually getting somewhere?  Once SDOT fills in some of the details that Judge Rogers is looking for—and shows that the project will not pose a significant impact to the environment—it’ll likely go back to the Hearing Examiner for a third go.  Then back to Judge Rogers, also for the third time.

We’re disappointed for several reasons.  First, that despite piles of evidence to the contrary, there are still pockets of attitudes that bicycling and industry are incompatible.  Also, that we might miss this summer’s construction season due to more legal wrangling.  And finally, that we may see yet more unnecessary injuries on the tracks and along the corridor as this gets figured out.

So be careful out there and help us finish this up.  Please consider a gift today to support the Burke-Gilman Legal Defense Fund so we can ride this one out together and get a safer trail built.

Burke-Gilman Trail Missing Link: Back in Superior Court #CompleteTheTrail

Thursday, December 15th, 2011 by

Tomorrow is another milestone for the Burke-Gilman Missing Link: another argument, back in King County Superior Court.  Yes, we’ve been here before, but haven’t we argued enough over this missing section of trail?  Or, better yet, how many times do we have to win the argument, and when do we get on with the business of finally building a safe section of trail?

The end is in sight, and we hope this is the last time.  But this seemingly endless cycle of appeals could actually continue.  (And rack up tens of thousands of dollars of additional legal fees for Cascade.  You can help us to victory with a gift to the Education Foundation today!)

As we continue down the legal path, the plot hasn’t dramatically changed.  We continue to believe that the trail section is a necessary safety improvement and connects up the backbone of our regional trail system.  The Ballard Business Appellants keep arguing that a trail would case significant traffic delays, parking loss, incompatibility with land use and wouldn’t be safe.

The quick synopsis. The City went back to study the route yet again a few hearings ago (due to concerns of “piece mealing” the analysis) and still determined that the trail would not cause significant environmental impacts.  Then on July 1 of this year, the Hearing Examiner (think of her like a judge) ruled that there will be no “probable significant adverse environmental impacts.”  The Ballard Business Appellants then appealed the Hearing Examiner’s ruling, which brings us to Superior Court tomorrow.  If we win yet again, the Ballard Business Appellants could appeal the forthcoming decision from Superior Court to the Court of Appeals or to the State Supreme Court.

Again, we hope this is the last time we have to win so we can get on with it.  As I’ve mentioned before, the City has been “eager to begin construction on a fully funded and fully designed ‘missing link’ segment,” according to SDOT.

We’ve got our eyes on the 2012 summer construction season.  It’d be a great time to celebrate.  We love ribbon cuttings.

We’ll be live-tweeting from the courtroom tomorrow starting at 2 p.m. Follow us on Twitter to hear how it’s going under #CompleteTheTrail. Please join in and share your thoughts on what this project means to you.

Please help us continue the fight for the Missing Link.  Your gift to the Education Foundation today will ensure we win!

Ballard Bridge repainting project

Saturday, November 12th, 2011 by

Ask a roomful of Seattle bicyclists to identify dangerous places to ride a bike, and the Ballard Bridge will quickly rise to the top of the list, second only to its notorious neighbor, the Missing Link.

Bicyclists just looking for an excuse to avoid the Ballard Bridge will be pleased to hear that the bascule portion will be undergoing a six-week repainting project starting the week of November 14.

The project will require closures of one sidewalk and adjacent travel lane at a time, starting on the east side of the bridge. SDOT has established bicycle detours via the Fremont Bridge (~ 4.5 miles) and the Locks (~ 3.5 miles).  While the extra distance may not be convenient, nor the detour segment along the Missing Link safe, neither is riding on steel bridge grating that is slicker than snot .

Plus, consider that the Fremont Bridge detour offers multiple bonus features that ARE bike-friendly. Depending on your route, you can ride the brand spankin’ new ship canal trail, the redesigned Nickerson Street or the mighty fine buffered bike lanes along Dexter Avenue.

Of course, while the painting project may enhance the aesthetics and extend the lifespan of the Ballard Bridge, biking across won’t be any prettier afterward. Fortunately, Seattle’s Bike Master Plan is scheduled for an update in 2012, which will be an important opportunity to identify key enhancements to improve bicycle safety on this – and all – of Seattle’s bridges and roadways.

photo: Grant M. Haller, Seattle Post-Intelligencer

Ready... GO!photo: Grant M. Haller, Seattle Post-Intelligencer

Vote YES on Proposition 1 – Keep Seattle Moving

Monday, September 12th, 2011 by

Cascade Bicycle Club is proud to announce our endorsement of Proposition 1, the ballot measure that will create a better transportation future for Seattle.

Cascade played a significant role in the development of Prop. 1. In fact, you could say that Cascade has been working toward this moment for over three decades.

I grew up in Broadview, tucked away in the northwest corner of Seattle. We didn’t have sidewalks in Broadview growing up. Heck, our street wasn’t even paved until my parents got together with our neighbors to form our own one street local improvement district.

As a kid, my bicycle was my ticket to freedom. It allowed me to go visit my friends all over the neighborhood and I could always tell where my friends were hanging out by the pile of bikes in the front yard. But we never rode our bikes outside of the quiet streets of Broadview. It just wasn’t safe.

It was more than my bicycle, however, that gave my friends and me the opportunity to explore our city. We used to take the bus to Southeast Seattle to visit our friends from school and to Northgate to try to meet girls (we normally failed). Taking the bus from one corner of the city to the other took nearly half the day, which didn’t leave us with much time to hang out.

Five years ago my wife Stacy and I moved back to Seattle so that we could start a family, and I could attend the Evans School of Public Affairs and learn how to create a better future. Returning to my childhood home three decades later, Broadview still has no sidewalks, it’s still not safe for kids to ride their bikes around Seattle, and it still takes half the day to take the bus from one corner of our city to the other.

Yes, we’ve made a lot of progress as a city. We adopted a Bicycle Master Plan and have taken significant steps forward in building out our bicycle infrastructure. We built a light rail line and have plans to dramatically expand the network. We adopted one of the most progressive Pedestrian Master Plans in the country (and then forgot to fund it). But at the end of the day, Seattle still has a long way to go to become the type of city we know it should be.

Stacy and I learned this first hand. We lucked into a place three blocks up the hill from the Locks in Ballard. The 44 ran two blocks from our front door to half a block from the Evans School. But when I took the bus to and from class, it kept taking me an hour to go five miles. So I decided to try riding my bike. Despite one large missing link, I could take the Burke-Gilman directly across town to school in under half an hour. The second day I was riding to class I got hit by a car. I was fine. Both the driver and I made mistakes that resulted in the incident. It was a giant wake up call.

Stacy wasn’t so lucky. She landed a job just up the hill from Gasworks, almost directly on the Burke. She’s not really a cyclist, but given that there’s not a good way to take the bus from our home to her work and $4 a gallon gas makes driving incredibly expensive, she decided to give riding a try. On her first attempt she got run off the road. That’s the last time Stacy ever rode her bike in Seattle.

But for me, bicycling was the only way I could get around. We could only afford one car so riding my bike was simply the fastest (and often only) way for me to get to work or school. After both Stacy and my incidents, I sought out and received an appointment to Seattle’s Bicycle Advisory Board because I wanted to help make our streets safer for bicyclists. There I had an incredible opportunity to work with passionate volunteers learning the ins and outs of bicycling in Seattle. The most important thing I learned was that we need a lot more money for bicycling facilities (a whole lot more) if we want to get serious about making bicycling a realistic option for people like Stacy who want to ride, but just aren’t safe.

Even though it seems everyone in Seattle talks about how we should be a city where everyone has the freedom to safely walk, bike, drive, or take transit to get where they need to go, for whatever reason, we aren’t aligning our infrastructure investments with this vision. We’re not spending our money in a manner which will create the future we want to live in.

This is exactly why I was proud to join with the Cascade Bicycle Club in launching the Streets For All Seattle campaign last year. We believed that the time had arrived for our city to get serious about funding the pedestrian, bicycle and transit infrastructure that our citizens demand and build a transportation system that will make Seattle work for our future.

We built a coalition of over 60 community, labor, business, political, transportation and environmental organizations who shared our vision of Seattle being a city where everyone has the freedom to safely walk, bike, drive, or take transit to get where they need to go. We set out to engage the entire city in a conversation about how we can build a better transportation future and give our elected officials the support they need to do the right thing.

We made things happen. We pushed the Seattle City Council to create a Transportation Benefit District to fund pedestrian and bicycle improvements and support basic street maintenance, and to form the Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee III (CTAC III), asking them to undertake a full review of the city’s transportation funding system and evaluate the potential for a ballot measure asking Seattle voters to fund additional transportation projects.

CTAC III performed a comprehensive review of how Seattle can fund and build a transportation system that will work for the future. When they reached out to and listened to the people of Seattle they heard some common themes: We want more walkable streets, family-friendly bicycle infrastructure, faster, more reliable buses, and streets that aren’t littered with potholes. More importantly, we expressed a willingness to pay for these investments because they would help us become the city we know we should be. Cascade had a seat at the CTAC III table and learned a ton through this conversation.

After crunching the numbers, reviewing the plans, and listening to the people, CTAC III asked the City Council to give Seattle voters the opportunity to vote yes on a package that would raise considerable funds for walking, biking and transit infrastructure, along with significant money to fix and maintain Seattle streets.

The City Council did their jobs, tweaking and refining CTAC III’s recommendation into Proposition 1, and on Aug. 16, they unanimously voted to send it to the November ballot.

Proposition 1 will give Seattle faster, more reliable transit service; repaired and repaved roads that work better for everyone; and new sidewalks, better crosswalks, and more family-friendly bike infrastructure. Now, we’ve transformed Streets For All Seattle from a coalition working toward a shared vision into the campaign to pass Proposition 1, a package of investments that will help achieve our shared vision.

It was an easy decision for Cascade to endorse Proposition 1. It 1 will generate $14 million for bicycle infrastructure over the next ten years. That’s enough to build twenty miles of neighborhood greenways and forty miles of bike lanes and sharrows. It will dramatically accelerate the implementation of the Bicycle Master Plan (and the Transit and Pedestrian Master plans) and provide the funding necessary for Seattle to start building separated facilities for the thousands of people like Stacy who want to ride, but just aren’t safe. Hopefully, it will help prevent more tragic and unnecessary deaths.

Proposition 1 is too modest of a package to solve all of our transportation problems, but it’s an opportunity to create a better transportation future. An opportunity to start becoming a city where we can rely on the bus to get us to work on time, the roads are smooth, and our children can ride their bikes to school.

If you’re reading this blog you probably care about creating a better community through bicycling. That’s exactly what Proposition 1 will do. We’ve got let than two months to get this done, please join us and let’s make it happen.

We’re kicking off the campaign on Tuesday, Sept. 13, 6 p.m., at the Moe Bar on Capitol Hill (1425 10th Ave); I hope to see you there.

And if you would like to volunteer, please email Cascade Advocacy Campaigns Manager, Max Hepp-Buchanan or give him a call at (206) 226-1040.